"The origin of the species" and ICO-TIN – The Difference Between Earth and Rest

November 24, 1859. The day when the “origin of species” was announced and the world was presented with a unique theory of existence, reasons for existence and processes of generation, evolution and survival of different species. The oldest and eternally long-lived were amoebae and other similar species. They went through all the ups and downs; through the rough phases presented by Mother Nature.

“The Origin of Species” was a kind of book, written to target everyone, to be read and understood by anyone. It was liked and popular among all classes, be it students, researchers, scientists or visionaries. It was popular all over the world for its neutral approach and comprehensive language. The theories remain applicable, and the book has proven useful for future biological and relative theoretical experiments and practical applications regarding the origin and development of different species on planet Earth.

Relative similarity between “species origin” and blockchain:

If Satoshi Nakamoto is “Darwin” from the crypto era, and cryptography is the “origin of the species,” given the fact that it all exists in the very world we all live in and has a significant impact around the world. He understood it, in the end even though it turned out to be a popular and widely accepted phenomenon almost all over the world.

While other cryptocurrencies have failed to survive and have lost their existence in the winds of change and evolution, just like earlier “single-celled” organisms, before amoebas. Bitcoin, as the most capable species, was the “amoeba” of this relative hypothesis. It is the cause, the inspiration, and the measure to be followed by other, more complex organisms. These organisms, for example Ethereum, were presented with a new concept of execution, which was ICO (initial coin offering). The relatively natural principles of development, nutrition, growth and reproduction prevailed and are known to all.

Discussions, scientific and religious, in time and long:

The “origin of the species” has spawned various heated debates, scientific-practical and religious-Orthodox, and there is a similar blockchain. The Orthodox community, or the religious groups that dominated at the time, were not flexible enough to allow any new theory to prevail in the society they had ruled for a long time. Likewise, the financial system that has dominated since society was introduced with money and currency does not want to change and is rigid for its set trends of several centuries. He may be afraid of the importance he might lose if his principles are replaced.

The book has been a conspiracy for a long time, and that rule is popularly known as the “eclipse of Darwinism”, i.e. From the 1880s to the 1930s. Despite all the evidence and explanations, “responsible” has held the “origin of the species” for quite a long time. People were forbidden to talk about “Darwin’s theories” in public or on social platforms. The current time frame could be compared to the same rule, where people could not discuss “cryptography” at financial meetings or forums related to centralized banks or finance-related social platforms, where the monopoly is a butler to large old banks and loans. companies.

Coexistence and definition of “EVOLUTION”:

Likewise, a number of other enthusiasts came along, with new icons turning to cryptocurrencies on the stock exchanges, and similar theories about world evolution, following the “origins of species”. It was then that Darwin’s theory was found which proved practical and applicable, and useful in new biological findings. Similarly, the world was introduced to the concept of ICO (initial coin offering). This led to a revolution, opening the door to the participation of non-technical, individuals in the crypto world.

As before, the concept was questioned, challenged and unfortunately, due to several irregularities and initial failures in the execution of some applications, (which was a very small ratio compared to successful ones), critics were given the opportunity to celebrate.


The “origin of the species” was later comparatively determined to be the definition and explanation of the evolution of different species on earth. It is also explained that what is the difference between the habitats on earth is probably on other planets, which is why LIFE is probably not possible elsewhere. Darwin did not talk about it; nor Nakamoto, about “ICOs.”

Authorities and “religious” bodies around the world are challenging the ICO as a concept. These “religious” (rigid in principle and unhappy with change) financial systems have their limitations. They give rigid orders for any new integration or experiment, introduction or invention within the system. These mandates tend to be a “dead end” for the ICO today.

In order to give ICOs a window into this “dead end” and with more explanations and integrations of this policy of “religious bodies” of a “rigid mandate”, ICO-TIN must come into the picture. To provide the necessary habitat for ICOs and to make “Earth” different from other planets, ICO-TIN makes a safe path between progressive ICOs and “religious” old financial systems.


The difference between the other planets is obvious in the availability of air and water around the habitable environment. As Darwin defines it, “life finds its way.” Of course it is. ICO-TIN has found a way to raise ICO to a higher level and make things mutually safe and useful.

The challenges and how ICO-TIN forms a mutually beneficial platform for people, as well as the teams implementing ICO, could be analyzed and understood in the study explained below.

The challenges in launching an ICO are now the following:

1) A smart contract has its limitations. It can reveal the address to which the cryptocurrency must be transferred, it is a unique address that applies to a particular ICO, and once the address is revealed to all or at least a large number of people interested in participating in that ICO, they can always come in to make payments.

2) As long as the contract is considered more efficient, but as many codes as there are, so much gas is consumed per transaction. So it is not at all profitable a smart contract to last long.

3) At that point, when the ICO cannot accept more than 14 transactions per second, an AUCTION situation occurs. In this situation, the set parameters encourage the completion of the transaction in any case, regardless of the price of gas.

4) SPF or single point failure occurs when such a scenario is created.

5) Compliance is another article that needs to be taken into account, covering two things.

The first is the KYC process, which is more complex than the others because it has to be integrated with image uploading which makes the system quite vulnerable and vulnerable to hack threats and malware.

The second is accounting, which is again a big task of regulation and supervision, because there are different cryptocurrencies on the stock market and one does not want to change the method of payment to any medium that is not used often.

6) The development of the strategy must be very planned and flawless. It encompasses three aspects, and now these three aspects are set in the traditional ways of the ICO, these three ways were:

AUCTION – where a particular form judges, which transaction should be given priority, based on the fact that the transaction is supported by a higher price for GAS

BUNTY – the award is usually given to participants or non-participants for introducing more people to the program or ICO. This prize was quite often a number of chips.

GAS – gas was a very significant factor when it comes to ICO startup, because there are so many transactions that fall due, and even a transaction in a very small amount is completed after the GAS is worth more than the same amount.

Application and necessity of ICO-TIN

ICO-TIN is the answer to all those challenges for someone who has been busy developing their technical and crypto skills and has never been willing enough to be skilled or smart enough to face the challenges of the underground market.

It’s more about a “professional” approach. Since someone is paid for something, it has to be great. Anyone could cut his hair, but we prefer a barber because he knows his job better. This explains the necessity of a professional package that is ICO-TIN.

It is an Enterprise solution for new ICO launches and offers a custom package that includes ICO launch and marketing.

The solutions to the questions are as follows:

1) The smart contract will not be available for access; the unique address will never be revealed to any of the participants. There will be parallel and more secure payment methods.

2) A simpler method of payment will be that through any method of payment (FIAT currency and BTC as well) a person will have to buy USD within the system, and his further purchase will be regulated by that USD.

3) This complete system will be the “OFF” program, which will be integrated with the system anyway; therefore there will be no transactions, nor consumption of any GAS during the transactions made by the participants

4) The payments that the system will make will be regulated in accordance with the periodic payable prices of GAS, and thus it will be a system of minimum liability for transactions both there and back.

5) There will be no auction for transactions, so gas consumption will not be a problem anyway.

6) KYC and accounts will be managed in different ways, with a system that will not be in direct alignment with the ICO, so it will not pose a threat to the ICO if image uploads are required.

7) Accounts will be managed seamlessly by individuals, and this could be done more efficiently.

Raising the “origin of species” to a new level was a challenge for biologists and other people involved, but they could not allow Darwin’s work and contribution to go in vain. Similar was the work of passing on the vision to future generations and encouraging progressive youth today.

It is not at all over-ambitious if “ICO-TIN” is considered a revised version of “Nakamoto’s” “origin of the species”. It opens the way to more experiments and the probabilities of combining “two worlds”.